ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 1 O/U 8.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan
$6.0K Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Match O/U 23.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Match O/U 21.5
$23.24 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Match O/U 22.5
$13.21 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Total Sets: O/U 2.5
$9.86 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 2 O/U 8.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 2 Winner
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 2 O/U 9.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 2 O/U 10.5
$0.00 Volume

Completed Match
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set Handicap +/-1.5
$19.74 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 1 O/U 9.5
$0.00 Volume

ITF Irvine: Kenta Miyoshi vs Rudy Quan Set 1 O/U 10.5
$0.00 Volume
This market refers to the tennis match between Kenta Miyoshi and Rudy Quan in the ITF Men Irvine, originally scheduled for June 19, 2026 at 6:15PM ET. This market will resolve to 'Kenta Miyoshi' if Kenta Miyoshi advances against Rudy Quan. This market will resolve to 'Rudy Quan' if Rudy Quan advances against Kenta Miyoshi. If the match is canceled (not played at all), ends in a tie, or is delayed beyond 7 days from the scheduled date without a winner determined, this market will resolve to 50-50. If the match begins but is not completed, and one player advances due to the opponent's retirement, default, or disqualification, this market will resolve to the player who advances. If the match ends in a walkover (player withdraws before the start and the other advances automatically), this market will resolve to 50-50. The primary resolution source will be official information from the International Tennis Federation (ITF). A consensus of credible reporting may also be used.
- Resolver: official source.
- Deadline: closing date in UTC.
- Disputed outcomes: handled by moderators within 48 hours.

Comments